Frame
Reading the question for what it actually asks.
Rhetorical synthesis, main idea and purpose, and any question hiding a constraint in the stem.
Forge reads how you work, then names what is actually costing you points.
Every question gets read across five moves of thinking. Together they spell the name, and they pinpoint where your points actually leak.
Reading the question for what it actually asks.
Rhetorical synthesis, main idea and purpose, and any question hiding a constraint in the stem.
Catching the details that matter in a passage or problem.
Words in context, vocabulary, and the evidence questions where finding the right line is the whole job.
Working through an inference one honest step at a time.
Inferences, cross-text connections, text structure, and multi-step math.
Pulling information together across two places or sources.
Graph and table questions, cross-text pairs, and anything needing two parts of a passage at once.
Carrying out your approach cleanly, without slips.
Boundaries and punctuation, transitions, and the algebra where you know the method and lose it to a slip.
After the diagnostic, Forge hands back observations like these, specific to how you (not the average student) move through the test.
What Forge noticedYou hold details well, but lose them when the answer needs two parts of the passage combined. Gather is where your points are leaking, and where your practice starts.Details fine. Combining two parts of passage: points leak. Gather weakest. Practice starts there.
You read accurately, but lose the forest for a tree. On "main purpose" questions you lock onto a vivid detail instead of the author's overall move. Your misses cluster where the right answer is the least flashy option.Read fine. Miss forest for tree. Flashy answer on main-purpose questions: trap. Boring answer usually right.
You answer the question you expected, not the one on screen. Add a constraint like EXCEPT or primarily and your accuracy roughly halves. The content isn't harder; the framing changed.Answer question you expected, not question asked. EXCEPT and primarily cut accuracy in half. Reread the ask.
You're sharpest in the first eight questions, then you speed up and slip. But your second-look changes are right four times out of five, so the instinct to slow down is correct.Start sharp. Speed up. Slip. Second look right four of five times. Slow down.
Illustrative of the read. Your real observations come from your own diagnostic. Caveman mode is on the real report too, one tap.Sample read. Real one comes from your test. Caveman mode on real report too.
Every other tool writes down one word for both of them: wrong.
Measured against your own pace and the question’s real difficulty. Not a stopwatch. A baseline.
B and C are different mistakes. We keep a separate read on every wrong option, not just the right one.
Estimated from how real students performed. Not from whoever wrote it deciding it felt hard.
There is a fourth signal we record on every question. That one is proprietary.

Full, timed, test-condition. Rasch scored with a real projection.

5,000+ questions, aimed at what your profile says is leaking.

Full practice tests, equated so two attempts actually compare.

Every miss kept, with a read on the wrong answer you picked.

Spaced review that brings a word back right before you lose it.

Give it your test date, get the weeks between mapped out.

Study alongside other people, with quests for turning up.

Paste in a real score report and get it translated.
A second skin for the whole product. Same questions, same measurement, different chrome: an adventurer with a level and a streak, a quest log that tracks what you are already doing, a satchel that fills as you work. One toggle, and it applies everywhere.
No card, no trial clock, no locked features, no counting your sessions. Every student gets the diagnostic, the full read, unlimited targeted practice, checkpoints and the arcade. There is no tier above this one to upgrade to. — Kevin
Nothing to cancel · nothing to upgrade
Your data stays yours: deletable in one click, no support ticket, any time you like. We never sell it.
4 in 5 of founder Kevin Choi’s students break 700 on Reading & Writing.
Most clear 1500+ overall. Kevin is an SAT instructor and the author of the Irreverent Guide to the Digital SAT; Forge is his read on how a student works, made always-on, over a bank of 5,000+ original and licensed questions. That track record is his teaching, not a promise about your score, but it’s the method Forge is built on.
A reader for your college essay. A verdict on the whole thing, plus notes pinned to the exact lines that caused them.
It never writes a word for you. That is the point of it.
The digital SAT. The diagnostic, the read, and the practice that comes out of it.
One Seneca account covers both, so what each one learns about how you work carries into the other rather than starting over.
No catch, and no paid tier waiting further down — everything on this page is the whole product. Three things make that work. Vindica sells this software to schools and academies, and that revenue covers the consumer version. The questions you answer make the read sharper for the students who come after you. And we are building the same layer for AP and TOEFL, so we would rather you already know what it does. You can delete everything you have given us in one click, and we do not sell it.
A quick Google or email sign-in, yes, so your profile saves and builds from the first question. It’s all free — no card, nothing to unlock. Want a look before you sign in? The score-report reader and the arcade need no account.
It's yours. Deletable and user-controlled: one click, no support ticket. Privacy is built into how the product works.
Your profile updates after every session, so you can watch the specific thing you are working on move. We will not put a number on it. Anyone advertising "+150 guaranteed" is quoting an average that has nothing to do with you, and they know it.